Do living objects and non-living objects follow the same rules?

 

Living things and senseless phenomena have more in common than we ever knew.

At the very least, that is the view of engineer Adrian Bejan of Duke University, and biologist James Marden.

According to them, what connects the two worlds is a theory that the system of currents - from the movement of animals to the formation of deltas - evolves in time to balance and minimize. defects. Flows appear to minimize rubbing or other forms of traction, so, over time, they flow more smoothly. This view Benjan first spoke 13 years ago and called the constructal law.

With Marden's help, Benjan believed that he had agreed on the biological and physical principles of the natural model through the 'Rules of Formation', which is also considered as the physics theory of evolution.

"This is a very interesting development for physicists as well as biologists," said Benjan. "The idea that organic evolution is similar to evolution in infinite flow systems." tri is a concept that is full of illusions but now has the potential to unify capital views and approaches according to principles that are completely different. The law of formation brings a great tool to test and find out about change in the world of senselessness and conscience. "

The team's results are posted online on the Physical Physics page - Physics of Life Reviews - a newspaper supported by the US Air Force Scientific Research Office and the National Science Foundation.

The story begins with two scientists trying to determine whether there are general rules between two very different forms of movement: the swimming of fish and the flight of other animals. Biologists often share the same view that the movements of fish and other animals are not the same. Fish live in water environment so they are not affected by earth gravity.

Picture 1 of Do living objects and non-living objects follow the same rules?

A freshwater fish in the Arctic has a shape that is adapted to living conditions.(Photo: American Fish and Wildlife Service)

Under the observation of Benjan, birds and other animals considered as weightlifting athletes, because moving requires them to work hard to overcome the gravity of the earth and the pressure of the air. He said that while swimming, fish also have such resistance and attraction from the sea floor.Therefore, the water circulating around the fish is like the air around the animals that fly on land.

Therefore, fish are also seen as weightlifters, and these types of animals are thought to conform to the formation rules, Bejan said.

"Even if we cannot predict exactly what animals will look like, if the evolutionary process starts again from the beginning on Earth, it happens on another planet, but it is discovered. that the movement of animals obeys the law of formation that allows us to say: with a gravity and density of certain tissues, their body composition will still evolve in a certain direction, ' Marden said.

In many articles over the past decade, Bejan has illustrated the law of formation that foresees the formation of natural flows, in all areas from biology and geophysics to dynamics. society and technology development.

'When thinking about Darwin and evolution, most people think of plants or animals,' Bejan said. 'That's not true, the model properties are everywhere in nature. The law of formation can be seen as a general rule of evolution, applied to many fields from physics to economics. '

He describes this rule as a lively film, where the scene follows the scene, the more smoothly the scene passes. He considered the formation rule (http://www.constructal.org) as the time of the film, flow configuration (design, drawings) drifted more easily.

'The law of formation is seen as covering all natural phenomena,' Bejan said, 'in short, it can be said that the evolutionary ice runs in a direction that in physics people call the terms: time. time and configuration. "

References:
Adrian Bejana, James H. Marden.The unified formation of layouts in biology and geophysics.Physics of Life Reviews, 2008;DOI: 10.1016 / j.plrev.2008.12.002