Should women be put on Mars first?

So far, the majority of astronauts in the world are men. However, the first mission to bring people to Mars should include women, according to a scientific writer who has been involved in a simulation mission on the red planet.

>>>If you don't bring people to Mars, humans will soon become extinct

Kate Greene, a science writer for Slate (USA), claims that women demand lower caloric intake than men and therefore need less backup supplies, making the mission of taking women whole. going to Mars will be cheaper and more feasible.

Last year, Greene participated in a project of the US Aerospace Agency (NASA), called "Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation" ( Hi-Seas ), which simulates a long-running mission. Fire is right on Earth.

Picture 1 of Should women be put on Mars first?
Kate Greene participated in the Hi-Seas project simulating NASA's Mars mission in 2013. (Photo: Hi-Seas)

This journalist and 5 others - a total of 3 men and 3 women - spent 4 months living in a domed house in Hawaii and were only allowed to leave the house in astronaut suits. This process simulates what can happen in a real mission to Mars, with the testing team spending most of its time in a building.

Any mission to Mars is said to have very few supplies, meaning any effort in such a mission will need to find ways to improve resilience. And according to journalist Greene, sending only women to Mars could be a good solution, based on her research throughout the simulation mission.

"Week after week, the 3 female members of the experimental group used less than half the calories of the 3 male members. We all practiced almost the same, at least 45 minutes a day in 5 days in a row every week, but our metabolic processes dissipate in completely different ways , " Ms Greene stressed.

According to the journalist of Slate, it is rare for women to burn more than 2,000 calories a day, while men's energy consumption levels often exceed 3,000 calories per day . Since then, she concluded, bringing women to Mars would be more economical and easy to implement than putting men on the red planet.

Most experts estimate that a mission to Mars tends to cost about $ 100 billion. Former NASA contractor Alan Drysdale once said that, compared to big people, smaller astronauts are more attractive options for such a mission.

Ms. Greene added that most astronauts also enjoy working in groups that gather both men and women."So if the core problem only concerns how to go to Mars, more women will be better," Ms Greene said.

The title has been changed.