Could Darwin be wrong about the origin of life on Earth?

According to the theory of scientist Charles Darwin, life can be formed in a 'warm lake' filled with salt, light, temperature . But this hypothesis may not be accurate.

To find the solution after Darwin's hypothesis, a team of researchers from the University of London had a different theory. They recreated the original situation in which the ray of life may have occurred and they believe it happened in . deep-sea hydrothermal vents.

The Darwinian hypothesis concerning the proven source of life may not be accurate.

Scientists need even more solid evidence when they completely reject Charles Darwin's hypothesis.

The team demonstrated the successful creation of early cells in a sea-like environment. In other words, scientists have shown that it can help life thrive in vents deep in the ocean where heat is trapped, causing chemicals to swirl and react.

Lead author of the study, Nick Lane said: 'There are many competing theories about where and how life begins. Underwater hydrothermal vents are one of the most promising locations for the start of life. Our findings add weight to that theory with solid empirical evidence. '

While both the theory Darwin and Lane offer have certain grounds, there are other theoretical considerations in theory.

Biologists, meanwhile, have another theory that life originates from . Mars and is transported to Earth via asteroids.

Currently, the new hypothesis of British scientists is attracting special attention from scientists thanks to convincing experimental evidence. However, scientists need to have more solid evidence when completely rejecting the theory of Darwinian scientist that has existed for a long time.

1. Shocking study of the origin of life on Earth
2. The collision could have originated for life on Earth