The truth falls back on the culprit who burned into Rome

The famous Nero tyrant of the Roman Empire had bloody, brutal pleasures. According to many documents, one of the wildest, craziest actions of the tyrant Nero is to order burned to Rome. is that true?

As one of the most famous princes of the Roman Empire, the tyrant Nero ruled Rome from 54 to 68. During his reign, Emperor Nero terrified the people by killing thousands of followers. Macabre way.

Even his mother, wife, siblings were also ordered cruelly by Emperor Nero.

The truth about the great fire in Rome is not caused by Nero.

The king's cruelty, madness, to a higher degree when supposedly lit the magnificent fire of Rome in July 64. This great fire was destroyed two-thirds of Rome. .

Accordingly, the Nero tyrant is most remembered by the people with the crazy act of burning fire to Rome. However, some experts and scientists argue that the truth about the fires is not caused by Nero .

According to this view, some experts said that at the beginning of the great fire, Nero was not present in Rome. Instead, this Roman prince was at Antium - where Nero was born. This area today is Anzio.

Upon receiving the news of the fire, Nero quickly returns to Rome and orders his subordinates to quickly process, extinguish the fire and help the victims.

Experts also pointed out that Tacitus - who accused Nero of the cruel acts of the prince, also wrote that no one knew that the fire of Rome occurred intentionally or unintentionally.

The reason that the great fire caused so much damage is because Rome has very narrow roads. Here, high-rise wooden buildings close together make fire spread quickly and hard to extinguish.

After this fire, Nero is believed to have issued a number of fire protection laws.