Congratulations to the designers, the people who are doing the job are hard to rob the robbery

With the requirements of creative and social skills, design can be the only kind of work that robots cannot take from you.

As robots are getting more and more progressive, sci-fi people are increasingly confused by a gloomy future when 'robots are coming to rob you of your work'. According to a 2013 study by Carl Benedikt and Michael A. Osborne, two researchers at Oxford University, robots are actually taking away our jobs - up to 47% of US jobs.

Titled 'The future of employment: How can jobs be computerized?' , when posted on an interactive website by Mubashar Igbar and Dimitar Raykov, this document simplifies the way we get the answer to the question: Will robots take away my job? If you want, you can also find the answer yourself when visiting this site: willrobotstakemyjob.com.

Robots are gradually replacing the work of many people.

What's interesting is that according to this website, the answer for most redesigners is no. For graphic designers, the risk of unemployment due to automation seems relatively low compared to other industries (8.2%), even with architects, this risk even lower (1.8%).

Meanwhile, other design jobs also have relatively low risk ratios such as interior design of 2.2%, flower designers 4.7%, fashion design 2.1% and Architect landscape is 4.5%. The only two design jobs with a risk ratio of up to two numbers are urban planners (13%) and software engineers (13%), although this is still group work. ' Do not worry'.

Design jobs also have a relatively low risk ratio.

Two researchers Frey, a colleague at Oxford University's Technology and Employment Program, and Osborne, a professor of machine learning, used both statistics on the historical impacts of automation as well as machine learning process to make predictions about the risk ratio.

They use the database on onetcenter.org as the source for their calculations. O * net is an online service developed for the US Department of Labor, which provides data on job replacement activities since 2010 (the most recent report) to date.

Later, the researchers selected 70 of the 702 jobs themselves, determining whether the job was susceptible to alternative automation (ranked 1) only if the next task on the list above o * net can be automated. Otherwise, it will be classified as a zero. The authors can then use the prediction algorithm to determine the possibility of future work automation.

Design is a profession where robots cannot rob your job.

From here, Iqbar and Raykov only need to take the results of their research and show them in a web page so that users can access it more easily, when they just need to search for a certain job or take a random example Of course. They also gathered more information from the US Bureau of Statistics to show the amount of work and the average salary, along with a description of the job.

Thanks to their simple design, one can easily see that software developers who 'research, design, develop and test OS-level software' - only 13 % likely to be replaced by robots. Meanwhile, computer programmers who "create, edit, and test code, forms, and scripts for running computer applications" - are up to 48% of the possibilities replaced by automation, (risk level: 'very disturbing'. )

Is this a big exit before the wave of automation? The authors of this document conclude that, as technology moves forward, low-level workers will be rearranged into jobs that are less likely to be subject to alternative computerization - jobs that require ask for creativity and social intelligence.' For workers who want to win this race . they will have creative and social skills .'