Expert warns: The emergence of sex robots will jeopardize society

Sex robots are becoming a trend in countries with sex industry. But is this a really good trend?

For many, it can be said that the era of sex robots (or sexbot) in the "sensitive" industry has come. Just spend a few thousand dollars (about 50 to over 100 million), anyone can own a surreal sex robot, designed according to hobby, bringing the latest life, and when needed. . wash dishes for us.

But is this trend good? Is that an inevitable process, or is it the "depraved" dark side of science? This is the question that led experts to argue right from the time the first sex dolls were born.

Picture 1 of Expert warns: The emergence of sex robots will jeopardize society
Is sex robot born a good trend?

In fact, optimists say that the birth of sexbot will create a safer world where there is no longer human trafficking. In that world, the red light neighborhoods will have hostesses, which can automatically clean up after each customer service.

But in a recent study, experts tried to consider the effects of sexbot on health and society. The results are not really good, because there is no evidence that sexbot can help the sex industry become safer.

Specifically, research author Chantal Cox-George from King's College London points out that there is no evidence that the use of sexbot benefits users, both health and social. Even, it has potential dangers that are really ominous.

Picture 2 of Expert warns: The emergence of sex robots will jeopardize society
Sexbot can obscure the line between real and virtual.

More seriously, Cox-George said that sexbot could blur the line between real and virtual, true and false. For example, with sexbot, acts like rape, sexual violence, or even pedophilia are allowed. It causes normal behavior that is not accepted by society to become normal, motivating their strong desire.

So what happens when these objects start getting bored with robots, while desires are increasing? Wouldn't ordinary people suffer too great risks?

Of course, this is just a point. There will be other studies to refute this point. But what do you think about it? Please leave a comment.