Turn over three tricks in Chinese history: Qin Shi Huang, Zhou De have been unfairly?

The story is said to be true, around the famous historical figures like Qin Shi Huang, Kang Hi, Qianlong . may have made their image distorted in posterity eyes.

Discussing past events, posterity often exclaims by saying: "History is written by the winner ". And also because of "the victor of the king", there are many truths that have been hidden from the truth for centuries.

In Chinese history, there are three incidents that have been misunderstood by the latter, even though those myths have been circulated so widely that they overwhelm the truth.

So which characters are the spectacular assaults in Chinese history? Invite readers to follow in the article below.

1. The truth about the age of Khang - The prosperity: Where is Ung Chính?

Portrait of three Qing kings in order from left to right: Khang Hi - Ung Chinh - Can Long.(Photo: Internet source).

"Khang - So prosperous" is a beautiful word used to praise the period of prosperity of the Qing dynasty under the reign of Kangxi - Qianlong.

According to the book "Thuong Duoc" , Can Long used to call his era "Khang - Can so prosper". The special point is that these two words "prosperous" are only associated with himself and Khang Hi Emperor, but not mentioning his father Ung Chinh.

There is even a stage, the posterity only refers to the merits of the couple - the famous grandson in the history of Thanh Trieu, and the person in the middle is Ung Chinh, he is brought with "resounding bad reputation".

The real period, Kang Hi and Qianlong are all rare soldiers, but to create such a prosperous period in Qing Dynasty history, it is impossible not to mention the merits and hardships of Ung Chinh.

In fact, in the time of Kangxi, the national army was heavily deficient by constant conquests. Ung Chinh ascended to the throne must receive this confusing face, furthermore working hard to salvage the national budget. Can Long succeeds his father and inherits his achievements to continue leading Dai Thanh to develop.

Ung Chinh's biggest merit for the Qing career must include the fact that he eradicated corrupt friends, enforced many strict tax regulations, terminated budget deficits and collected some huge money. Great for the nation with 60 million taels.

Therefore, the fact that his name is not even "present" in the word "Khang - Can so" is what makes modern historians doubt about the authenticity of the period considered to be the peak that time of Thanh Dynasty.

2 . "Burning a burial book" - Thousands of years of injustice

"Burning a burial book" - what is it about Qin Shihuang?(Illustrations).

Despite being the first Emperor to unify China and to carry out many major cultural - economic - political reforms, the name of Qin Shihuang was "blackened" by many events. Brutal, bloody, one of them is the most catastrophic "burial book " mission in history.

But, through the process of searching for materials and studying hard, many modern Chinese historians have helped Thuy Hoang award "that unjust thousand years" . According to some researchers' explanation, the "burning burial book" event is a misunderstanding of the posterity about this Emperor.

The truth is that Qin Shihuang had "burned books" , but the books he destroyed were mostly the histories of the countries before the reunification, the poems passed down in the folk and the family's words.

The act of Thuy Hoang is essentially a policy to solve outstanding difficulties after the most unified country, but the main purpose of which is to prevent crooks taking advantage of the documents to disturb the new court. establish.

In fact, every time a new dynasty is opened, burning books is a common thing in Chinese history. Because no imperial emperor wanted to save "rebellious sprouts" through previous dynastic documents.

Talking about "burying Confucius", the truth is that Qin Shihuang only ordered the extermination of the " forbidden" soldiers to warn the next generation. This work stems from the wizards taking advantage of the "devotion" and longevity desire of Qin Shihuang to salvage money and fame.

Originally, the purification and burning of books was the "meal" in Chinese history full of war and mutiny. Regretfully, because Qin Shihuang was the first emperor, so his injustice kept clinging to his reputation up to several thousand years without washing.

3. The secret behind the Ming middle god was killed 10 people because of one sentence

The "killing 10 families" project of Phuong Hieu is still mentioned by the poster as one of Minh blood's most bloody cases.(Illustrations).

Phuong Hieu Nhac's "killing ten families" tragedy under Chu De is often referred to as the bloodiest family tragedy in Chinese history.

This is also one of the events that caused the third emperor of the Ming Dynasty, Mingcheng, Chu De, to be judged as "brutal" and "close".

The fact that Zhou De had the "hustle" reputation was indeed a difficult language to avoid, because he himself had mercilessly killed his nephew to rob the throne, even murdering 3,000 women to be angry.

But whether or not the clan of Phuong Hieu's family was actually ordered by Chu De to "kill 10 of them" would need to be considered.

Legend has it that Phuong Hieu Nhut was the person assigned to the responsibility of Kien Van De to reign and reign the country. By the time Zhou De succeeded in taking the throne and celebrating the coronation ceremony, he had appointed the mandarin Fang to replace himself to the throne.

Any doubt Phuong Hieu Nhut not only did not do it, but also wore a mourning shirt to the great power of crying miserably, only the face of the new emperor said four words: "Yen abdicated" (The enemy Yen stole the throne).

After that sentence, Phuong Hieu cried the pen and screamed, cursed and loudly declared that even if he died, he would not write a letter on the throne for Chu De. Under the anger, Chu De ordered the "killing 10 families" order from Phuong Hieu Nhuong.

That is the whole anecdotes about the "killing 10" event that is widely circulated by the posterity.

But experts say that even when the history is judged to be "blacked out", Ming Dynasty like "Minghui" did not mention this event. The anecdote only appears in the history compiled by Chuc Chi Son and has been circulated so much by everyone . everyone believes it is true!

Killing 10 families of a mandarin family that used to be used for capital is not small. However, the accuracy of this incident still needs to be carefully considered.

Today, Chinese history still exists many stories "thought to be true but turned out not to be true".

The veil of time and the fluctuations of the time have enveloped the past with a fuzzy veil that makes it difficult to distinguish reality. And the truth behind many secrets buried deep in the sand of that time is still waiting for the consequences to find answers .