The doctrine beats Israel's nuclear nuclear opponent

Determining a potential opponent of nuclear weapons, Israel will immediately take action to ensure its survival.

North Korea's continuous test of missiles and nuclear bombs made the United States increasingly concerned that Pyongyang was about to possess weapons of mass destruction that could fire North America. In the 1970s, Israel also experienced this fear, forcing them to develop a doctrine to eliminate the nuclear threat from the egg , according to the NYTimes.

In 1976, Iraq purchased the Osiris-class nuclear reactor from France with a statement for the purpose of peaceful scientific research. However, Israel believes that the reactor designed by Iraq to build a nuclear warhead mounted on ballistic missiles could destroy the country.

After taking office in 1977, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin sought to convince the United States and Europe that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was an obvious and obvious threat to the Jewish nation, demanding that they take action immediately. However, Mr. Begin's advocacy efforts did not produce any results.

The late Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin.(Photo: Wikipedia).

But Begin still believed in his judgment and in 1981, he decided that Israel must act to prevent Iraq from possessing nuclear weapons. His political opponents, led by Shimon Peres, considered it a dangerous decision. Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan also objected to unilateral action against Iraq because he believed this would harm Israel's international status.

Defense Minister Ezer Weizmann also strongly opposed the military plan. He argued that launching an air raid on Iraq's nuclear facilities had unacceptable risks.

Prime Minister Begin had no military experience, but his family was massacred in Nazi Holocaust. He considers leader Saddam Hussein a "new Hitler" and a clear threat to Israel. Begin thinks that waiting for the best is not a good strategy, but an act of inviting the enemy to attack. If you pay the political, diplomatic, military, or military price, Israel is best off doing it before Iraq owns a nuclear bomb.

In the summer of 1981, Begin personally ordered the operation of Opera. The Israeli Air Force conducted a daring, bombing raid that destroyed the Osiris reactor, killing 10 Iraqi soldiers and a French engineer.

The raid has shocked the world. The Security Council condemned Israel's unilateral military action, Europe was angry, and the NYTimes at that time called Tel Aviv's offensive decision "defenseless". But Prime Minister Begin has no intention of defending, he only offers a simple argument, later known as the Begin Doctrine : Israel will not allow enemies to possess weapons that can destroy this country.

A decade later, when the Gulf War broke out, Begin's theory proved its correctness. The Iraqi army then launched a series of Scud ballistic missiles into Israeli cities, causing some civilian damage and panic, but the missiles were not equipped with nuclear warheads. Those warheads had been wiped out by the Israelis in the bud.

The Osiris reactor was completely destroyed after the air raid.(Photo: Wikipedia).

Begin doctrine was applied by Israel again in 2007, when the country claimed that Syria was seeking to build a nuclear reactor with the help of Korea. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, a student of Begin, sent an intelligence director, Mossad Meir Dagan, to Washington, persuading the US to intervene.

The CIA director at that time Michael Hayden agreed with Israel's assessment that Syria was building a nuclear reactor, but he persuaded President George W. Bush not to attack, by bombing the county facility. That person will cause an unexpected total war.

Realizing that the United States refused to act, Israel decided to continue unilaterally acting and destroying Syria's nuclear facility in the air strike allegedly killing a group of North Korean experts. Later, Hayden admitted that he had made a false statement about how Syria reacted. Some experts believe that if Israel followed the CIA and did not act, Syria could now own nuclear weapons.

A few years later, Israel also spent billions of dollars to prepare and train plans to eliminate Iran's nuclear program, but the administration of US President Barack Obama prevented any unilateral military action. Which of Tel Aviv. In 2015, the United States and five other great powers reached a nuclear deal with Iran, despite Israel's objections. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu warned that the deal is still lacking, allowing Iran to secretly develop its nuclear program and build new types of missiles.

Israeli officials accused Iran of continuing nuclear cooperation with North Korea and imitating Pyongyang's tactics of deploying large numbers of artillery through Hezbollah armed forces in Lebanon and Syria to threaten Israeli cities. The Korean artillery division threatens South Korea's capital Seoul is considered the biggest deterrent to any military action by the US-South alliance aimed at North Korea.

The commentator Zev Chafets said that Begin's Doctrine could be a warning to the US in dealing with the current Korean crisis. According to him, every time Korea launches a ballistic missile or detonates a nuclear bomb, the country will gain more practical experience for the process of manufacturing intercontinental rockets. Nuclear warheads can fire to the United States.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un inspected a missile test.(Photo: KCNA).

Chafets said that if the US does not take drastic actions but just wait for the best to happen, the US allies in the region like Japan and South Korea may consider the Begin Doctrine to apply for themselves. and launched a preemptive attack on Korea.

After Pyongyang's nuclear test for the sixth time, the Seoul and Tokyo governments are under tremendous pressure from public opinion and opposition parties to take more drastic action to deal with missile and particle threats. Right next to the armpit. Although experts assess the possibility of these countries developing their own preemptive attacks and attacks, it is still far away, nothing cannot happen during the current Korean crisis.