Why do men have nipples?

If there is such a Almighty Creator then why did He create a man with a part that they did not use?

Dr. Mitchell Tommy, a famous scientist and doctor in the US, said he had received many questions with the question "Why do men have nipples?". Below is Dr. Mitchell Tommy 's answer to this question posted on Answersingenesis.org.

Evolutionary theory often refers to this problem as an objection to the concept of the Creator. After all, if the Almighty Creator exists, why did he create a man with a part that they didn't use? In women, the nipple has an obvious function to breastfeed. So the question of male nipples appears?

An evolutionary view that nipples in men are the remains of human evolution. They are often considered degenerative organs. The idea is that nipples in men have had functions in the past, but when human evolution evolved, their functions were lost. After rigorous research and examination, this view is not considered meaningful. In fact, this is a very poor proof for human evolution.

If the male nipple is a degenerate organ, they must have a stronger function in the past. Are evolutionary theories suggesting that our male ancestors were lactating before and for some reason in their evolution have been lost? Or perhaps evolutionary theory that our ancestors were all women and men today is a part of the collective. And also in the process, they lose their ability to produce milk?

In women, the nipple has an obvious function to breastfeed.

In fact, evolution recognizes that mammals have evolved from reptiles and the difference between males and females occurs first from reptiles. So why then did other changes not happen when people began to evolve? If evolution is real, we can argue that male nipples are still in development and men can still breastfeed in the future!

Creativity theory gives a more convincing explanation for the presence of nipples in men. Accordingly, they are not traces of evolution, but are vestiges of the embryo.

The male and female embryos are basically the same. All of these embryos have a structure that will later form the definitive physical properties of men and women. In the early stages of development, all embryos have both Wolffian tubes (renal tubules) and Muller tubes. Under the influence of the Y chromosome, the Wolffian system will develop into the internal and external structures of the male anatomy and the Muller tubes will gradually degenerate. In contrast, the absence of the Y chromosome caused the Wolffian system to degrade significantly and the Muller system fully developed. This constitutes many anatomical structures in women.

However, one thing needs to be clarified that not all embryos are female in the first place . The genetic structure of each individual is created from the moment of fertilization. Therefore, "male" or "female" has been identified from the beginning and the gender structure is simply the result of the expression of those genes.

Related mammary and nipple systems are similar in both sexes and develop during the sixth week of pregnancy. The rudimentary mammary gland system is almost indistinguishable from birth. These tissues are sensitive hormones and in both sexes they can respond to the female hormone estrogen of the mother who crosses the placenta. Therefore, in some cases, infants may also excrete milk. Breast tissue in men and women has not really developed much until it is influenced by female hormones estrogen in the early stages of puberty in women. If the nipples and breasts are "useless" for men, are they useless for girls who are not puberty or any woman who does not breastfeed?

It should be noted that men's nipples are not completely useless. They are very sensitive and are a source of sexual stimulation in men. In addition, it will be problematic to describe them as degenerate parts because they are completely nerve-damaging vessels. So there is no reason why this department has become the "worthless product" of our ancestors.

In some cases, infants may also excrete milk.

The presence of nipples in men is actually an example of God's wisdom and creativity. The only problem is that in fact, evolutionists always have problems with this question because they cannot explain the reason for the "persistent" existence of the nipple in the evolution of mankind. .

The following is an explanation by Andrew M. Simons, a biology professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.

"The question of why a man has a nipple can be explained by many different ways. My 4-year-old daughter is always suspicious when asking such questions and not receiving sentences. When looking for an answer to this problem, she quickly added that "men's breasts will look rather funny when there are only hairs without nipples".

The work of evolutionary biologists is to explain diversity in nature and they are expected to be able to provide a convincing explanation for "why" questions like this.

Through research, some characteristics can be interpreted as adaptation, while others may be good products of evolution but not adaptive. This is because evolution is a process affected by many factors including history and genetic mechanisms. These factors also explain why the organism's specific properties are not the same as the "original" design. Therefore, the nipple in men is the explanation for the evolutionary effect that is influenced by this.

A baby born will inherit a copy of all genes from the father and a copy from his mother. Therefore the genetic characteristics of a young boy must be a combination of the characteristics of both parents. So from a genetic point of view, the question of why men with nipples need to be reversed: How do men and women differ if they all inherit genes from their parents? We know that the difference between male and female (temporarily called bisexual ) is quite common - for example, bisexual color in bird feathers and size in insects. The only way these differences can develop is that traits (eg color) in both sexes become "non-paired" at the genetic level.

The presence of nipples in men can be explained in the most logical way as a genetic correlation.

This occurs when a trait is influenced by different genes in men and women and if it is controlled by genes that are in the sex chromosome or if gene expression has developed to become dependent into specific contexts (whether that gene finds itself in a male or female genome). The idea of ​​the common genetic basis of two traits (in this case in men and women) is known as a genetic correlation and it is a quantity often measured by evolutionary genetics.

The separation of traits in men and women occurs when that trait plays an important role in the successful fertility of both men and women , however, the most optimal trait in each gender will be different. We would not expect the separation to occur if a certain attribute is important and its "optimal" value is similar in both genders and we cannot expect development pairing either. If the attributes are important to a gender but not important to the rest. This is also the case with a nipple question in men.

The advantage of these attributes in women is reproductive quite clearly.The presence of nipples in men can be explained in the most logical way as a genetic correlation . In a sense, men's nipples are similar to degenerate structures, for example the rest of the pelvis that whales don't use. If it is really harmful, such parts have long since disappeared.

In a famous article, Stephen Jay Gould and Richard C. Lewontin emphasized that we should not immediately assume that every human trait needs a corresponding explanation.The presence of nipples in male mammals is "architectural genetic byproduct" from females. So the answer to the question of why men have nipples is simply because women also have.