9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

Darwin's theory of evolution plays a huge role in explaining the source of life and the evolution of living organisms through evolution. But Darwin's doctrine also encountered numerous critics of the scientific world.

Darwin's theory of evolution plays a huge role in explaining the source of life and the evolution of living organisms through evolution. But Darwin's doctrine also encountered numerous critics of the scientific world. Even New Scientist claimed that Darwin was wrong and gave the following 9 reasons.

Picture 1 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

The article on New Scientist confirmed Darwin was wrong.

1. The Law of Biogenesis of Louis Pasteur

Louis Pasteur (December 27, 1822 - September 28, 1895), a famous French scientist, was a pioneer in the field of microbiology, claiming: Life must originate from life itself . Simply put, children must have parents born. A conscious creature, even the smallest, simplest cell cannot be created from the random combination of unconscious chemical atoms. This is a law proven by Pasteur, called the Biogenesis Law (Biogenesis) . So far the question of how the origin of life originates continues to be an unanswered question for mainstream science. In order for Darwin to be right, the Law of Creation - one of the most fundamental and solid laws of biology - must be wrong. After an undisputed experiment, Pasteur declared decisively:

Picture 2 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

"Spontaneous generation theory" will never be able to recover from the punch like the heaven of this simple experiment. No, there is no known case to confirm that microorganisms can be present without germs, without their parents. "

2. Cytoplasmic cells do not evolve on eukaryotic cells through mutations

Human cells do not evolve to eukaryotic cells through mutations, but through symbiosis (symbiosis). The fact that unicellular microbes evolve into larger cells and complicate them hundreds of times is a story left entirely in evolutionary theory.

Nymphs are actually more complex than Darwin imagined.

"It's true that eukaryotic cells are the most complex cells we know. But the simplest life forms we know of, prokaryotes, they themselves are extremely complex. If multiplication is A laptop is a mobile phone, there is no evidence that there are simpler forms of life from which human beings evolve into " - Jonatthan Wells (biologist) and William Dembski (mathematician)

3. The explosion of life in the Cambrian explosion (Cambrian explosion)

That was the sudden appearance of almost all major animal branches around 530 million years ago as fossilized storage proved. Previously, most organisms were simple individuals. Within 70-80 million years the speed of evolution has increased at a surprisingly mysterious speed. Darwin himself noted in his book The Origin of Species that the sudden emergence of arthropods in fossil storage during the Cambrian period raises a problem for evolutionary theory.

Picture 3 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

The creature exploded in the Cambrian century.

4. There are no intermediate links

"The number of intermediate forms, which had to exist on Earth, must be very large. But why can't these intermediate links be found in strata layers? This is probably the The clearest and most powerful protest can be raised against my hypothesis " - Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species.

"Every paleontologist knows that fossil storage contains very few intermediate forms; the transition between key groups can be said to happen suddenly" - Stephen J. Gould , Harvard University professor.

5. Fixed, unchanged, creature

" The fixed (statis) of most fossil species throughout its long life as seen in geology has been recognized explicitly by all paleontologists, but almost as has never been studied in detail because the prevailing hypothesis considers it an antithesis to non-evolutionary evidence: the overwhelming mass of fixedness in fossil remains becomes a shameful trait, but has been ignored as nothing at all " - Stephen J. Gould.

6. Information in DNA

"Information is information, information is not material or energy. What materialism fails to realize this will not survive a day" - Norbert Weiner (professor of mathematics at university MIT, considered the father of cybernetics, cybernetics).

Information is not material, but it can be conveyed through material. There is no evidence that information can evolve or improve through mutations.

Copy errors, also known as point mutations, occur once in 10 billion characters. And every human DNA sequence contains about 3 billion genetic characters.

"DNA is like a computer program, but much more advanced, a lot of any software has ever been created" - Bill Gates.

Picture 4 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

If we have a 40G hard drive, a DNA tip can contain 100 million times more information than that hard drive.

"The amount of information that can be contained in DNA on one end of the needle is equivalent to a stack of 500 times thin books of length from Earth to the sun, with separate content not repeated" - Jonathan Sarfati, physicist and chemistry.

In other words if we have a 40G hard drive, a DNA tip can contain 100 million times more information than that hard drive.

Therefore it is impossible to believe that random and blind evolution can happen.

"Knowledge of DNA has been shown, because the complexity is almost unbelievable about the arrangement needed to be able to produce life, that a sense of intelligence must be involved in making it possible. these extremely diverse elements work " - Antony Flew, the famous British atheist.

7. Survival struggle is not the main driver of evolution

Scientists at Bristol University argue that "living space" is the main driving force.

"New studies suggest that major evolutionary changes occur when animals move to a new living space, not yet occupied by other animals" - BBC News

8. Darwin's Tree of Life does not properly describe reality

A model that describes the connection between species rather than a bush is not a tree."We have no proof that the tree of life is a reality. " - Eric Bapteste, a biologist at France's Pierre and Marie Curie University.

Picture 5 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

Darwin's tree of life does not properly describe reality?

Genetic experiments on bacteria, plants and animals increasingly reveal that different species hybridize more than we ever thought. It means that instead of species that simply transfer to its own species, it also exchanges and crosses with other evolutionary branches. Resulting in a bush of life is much more complicated than the so-called life tree.

"The tree of life is being buried delicately. It is less acceptable than the fundamental view of biology needs to be changed" - Michael Rose, a biologist at UCI.

9. People do not evolve from gibbons

The idea that 99% of human DNA of DNA is no longer true. The latest research shows that this figure is only 93%. Great differences occur in body structure, brain, intelligence, and behavior . ("How Much DNA Do We Share With Chimps?" Softpedia, Nov. 20, 2006, p. 1)

Picture 6 of 9 reasons Darwin's theory of evolution is wrong

Do people really evolve from gibbons?

Update 18 December 2018
« PREV
NEXT »
Category

Technology

Life

Discover science

Medicine - Health

Event

Entertainment