Headache to find the answer to the question:

The following lines of contradiction and assertions below will provide more interesting perspectives that delve into the core of this issue.

It is difficult to compare and contrast our brain with a computer system, because they simply do not have much in common in the same category and field. However, there are still interesting connections around these two distinct concepts, such as the question : "How much of our brain can store data?" .

The first question - the average memory gap inside an individual's brain - will depend on many factors related to themselves. Typically, an individual is identified as " 1 GB " of memory, equivalent to about 1,000 GB. Today, owning an external hard drive with twice the memory capacity costs less than 100 USD.

The brain is composed of approximately 100 billion neurotransmitters.

However, many conflicting opinions support the notion that the number associated with memory ability of the brain can be up to 100 TB. Explaining this, Forrest Wickman from Slate said:

"The average brain is composed of approximately 100 billion neurotransmitters [Note: actually 86 billion, but consider it to be an overstatement]. Each neuron has the ability to create 1,000 links. around it, representing 1,000 synapses, is primarily responsible for processing and storing data. Try multiplying that amount by 100 billion times, resulting in 1 hundred trillion bytes of reception. information, equivalent to 100 TB ".

Of course, there are still some unreasonable points behind Wickman's argument. In his view, each synapse can contain 1 byte of data. But in reality, the amount of information that can be transmitted is not entirely fixed by such a theory-like nature. Simply because the nervous system not only exists in two forms of on / off like computers, but also many other complex states. Just as the concept has been mentioned earlier:

"The synapse is a wire connecting two neurons: one in the front, and the other behind the joint. The anterior neuron emits a neurotransmitter, which is received by the receptor at the side neuron. then to activate the ion osmosis channel inside the cell membrane.

Specifically, ion channels are like a protective membrane for neurons: they allow electrolyte atoms such as salt, potassium and calcium to be absorbed into the cell, playing an essential role in the control and recovery processes. Restores the flexibility of joints.

All in all, all of these comments add to the conclusion that when neurons connect and "communicate" with each other, it is both a sophisticated and complex process, not as simple as a switch. simply on the computer ".

The nervous system not only exists in two forms of on / off like computers, but also many other complex states.

Most computer microprocessors are compared and simulated brain activity in binary form - but that statement is not the opposite.

For greater clarity on this, synapses operate in an interdependent and interdependent manner in order to achieve the best conduction efficiency. According to many previous points of view, the great neural network of human beings will grow and improve the processing speed over time, but that can also mean the ability to store as well. gradually reduced. However, psychologist Paul Reber from Northwestern University supported the opposite view, with the theory proving extremely surprising and shocking:

"Neurons are linked together to assist in processing, analyzing multiple memories and data at the same time, while contributing to a significant expansion and consolidation of the brain's ability to store up to the same number. 2.5 PB (1 PB approx. 1000 TB) Illustrating this, assuming the brain has the same function as a digital video clip, 2.5 PB will be able to include 3 billion hours of viewing Your "pitiful" TV will have to turn on continuously for more than 300 years to make the most of it. "

So in the end, what is the most accurate number for the previous question? 1 TB? 100 TB? Or 2,500 TB? Or perhaps a person's whole consciousness can be crammed into a mere 300 MB - the capacity is only 60 songs of common sense - as the hypothesis is given in the Caprica prequel?

The brain's storage capacity is said to have a certain limit.

Perhaps the above are just questions that have nothing to do with the real problem taking place. We have affirmed that the brain does not operate in the same manner as the video recorder or most computer systems, and then goes back and forth to find answers to the question: How often does a memory possess? Much memory of the brain?

Are more honest and detailed memories more "heavy" and more capacity? Forgotten memories are actually deleted or hidden just under the small folders in a corner, some corner inside your head? And yet another question in all the other examples: What is the GIF file format that corresponds to the nervous system?

Perhaps it is better that we focus on learning about an intensive category, especially the brain's storage capacity which is said to have a certain limit, so there will definitely be a method. somehow it is effective enough to measure the above figure.

It has been, is and will be a long way, an important task associated with many rich and diverse fields such as neurobiology, robotics and computer science - especially in these areas. vi interactions between all three disciplines.