New hypothesis about the origin of the moon

The moon formed after a nuclear explosion on earth, two international scientists confirmed.

The origin of the moon and the reason it flies around the earth is one of the greatest mysteries for the scientific world for centuries. The most widely accepted hypothesis is: When the solar system was born, a celestial body collided with the earth and caused a mass of soil and rock to be thrown out. That mass of material revolves around the earth and becomes the moon.

However, there are two scientists who do not think so. According to the Daily Mail, it is Rob de Meijer - an expert at the University of Western Cape, South Africa - and Wim van Westrenen of the University of Freedom, the Netherlands. They thought that the celestial object hit the earth not the event that caused the moon to separate from the earth. Instead, a nuclear explosion on the earth is the main cause.

Meijer and van Westrenen make the argument based on the theory of "double-breeding" that was initiated in the 19th century. According to this theory, the earth and the moon are created by molten lava in the universe. Then part of the earth split and became the moon.

But scientists who support the "dichotomy" theory cannot explain why a part of the earth can be separated.

In the latest study, Meijer and van Westrenen said that if the moon is separated from the earth by a celestial collision, it must certainly contain material from the earth and from that celestial body.

However, the soil samples on the moon show that the chemical structure of "Ms. Hang" is similar to the globe. This means that the moon is not created by the collision between the earth and a celestial body.

According to two researchers, one possible explanation is: The moon is separated from the earth by the energy inside. They believed that the force of the moon was created by a terrible nuclear explosion. This explosion is the result of extremely strong nuclear decay between the shell and core of the blue planet.

Clay Dillow, an expert of Popular Science magazine, supports this view.

"We cannot verify Meijer and van Westrenen's hypothesis, but we all know that nuclear decay actually takes place in the ground. They leave the uranium that humans are exploiting , " Dillow said.