A murder case does not know the victim, unknown perpetrator, only deduced through a few facts on paper.
Puzzle is not only a method to train thinking and concentration, but also a game that can stimulate the brain. Therefore, this is one of the ways to help us become alert when necessary.
However, not all puzzles allow you to solve easily. As a puzzle about the case below, it's for people with really good logic. You will have to own a very high, good IQ . Conan can only solve it.
Let's try it.
Background: An investigator is dealing with a murder involving 5 people who know each other. 1 person is a victim, murdered with a pistol, and the culprit also belongs to this group. However, the document does not indicate who is the victim and who is the culprit, but the investigator will have to rely on reasoning.
The identity of 5 people is as follows:
John : John is an amateur tennis player.The day after the case, he joined a tournament.The opponent is a person who has nothing to do with the case.
Jack: Jack just moved to the city before the case happened.He was born and raised on a small island, with his main occupation being fishermen.Jack's lifelong dream is to own a fishing boat.
Steve : Steve is a model, also a lover himself.A few days before the case, Steve met Bill to make a full body portrait.
Bill : Bill is a portrait artist.He plans to complete Steve's painting in a week.
Alex: Right after the case happened, Alex went to Antarctica to study marine life.At the time of the investigation, Alex was still in Antarctica with 20 other scientists.
Some other facts:
1 week before the incident, the murderer broke his leg. Steve and Alex just got together for about 6 months before the murder happened.
Alex and the murderer are childhood friends - they are neighbors, living in a big city.
The data is here. Did you guess the answer? Think about it and give an answer.
We must deduce as follows:
John played tennis the day after the incident, meaning he was not the culprit, because the perpetrator broke his leg a week earlier. If it was John, he couldn't heal so quickly.
Alex is not the culprit, because he is a friend of the killer from an early age.
Steve is also innocent, because he only met Alex a few months before the case happened.
Hunger can only be Jack or Bill. But because the culprit lives in a big city, we can remove Jack because he lives on an isolated island from a young age.
So, the killer is Bill.
Who is the victim? We have confirmed that Alex is in Antarctica, John still plays tennis after the incident, Steve is still modeling for Bill to draw, so they are still alive. Using the exclusion method, the victim is Jack.
In conclusion, Bill shot Jack .