The mysteries surrounding big foot creatures

Bigfoot in the film was shot in 1967 by a man named Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Northern California (Photo: compuserve)

A photograph, a proof or a trace cannot become decisive. Specific evidence is always needed: bones or skulls, which are still undetectable today. Someday we will discover the existence of this "monkey" , while the present creature called Bigfoot is still a great mystery.

It is described as a omnivorous bipedal creature, nocturnal, in forests in the mountains or where water is available. It is about 2.20 meters high to 3.75 meters tall, weighing about 250 to 450kg. Faces such as health, hearing, sight and smell are better than humans. However, it has harmless, non-aggressive properties. It is called the Bigfoot due to its footprints left on the ground (up to 45 cm long).

One of the most disturbing documents for us is a film about an animal of this type walking around in a forest. The film was shot in 1967 by a man named Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Northern California. Many scientists have carefully tested the film and concluded that there were no techniques used to make the film. Bigfoot's existence only manifested in the footprints it left on the ground, and the traces were conducted by specialists, especially the anthropologist Grove S.Krantz, for anatomical studies. organism mechanics.

Bigfoot's return?

A Bigfoot image (Photo: geocities)

After a quiet time, recently the event about Bigfoot emerged again, especially in Canada. In April 2005, a ferry driver on the Manitoba river of the country filmed a dim, big, black, transient creature along the river. Not sure what it is - Bigfoot or the bear . - but it has also become a hot topic.

Three months later, near the Yukon area, a Teslin resident named Trent Smarch discovered a large, black feather in the forest where he and the locals had heard of a huge, mysterious beast. They believed it was the Sasquatch, a big, hairy, tall version of Bigfoot of Canada. This finding was widely informed throughout North America and around the world, and people wondered if the feathers would eventually prove the existence of a fierce controversial Bigfoot creature. in the past or not. The hair sample was then transferred to the University of Alberta for the wild life geneticist David Coltman to analyze DNA and compare it with data on regional organisms. Only on July 28, one week after the test, the results were announced. And there were some first foundations in studying Bigfoot evidence.

Bigfoot begins to form

Compare Bigfoot's feet with normal human feet (Photo: tqnyc)

in our mind since 1959, with a news article about the discovery of huge footprints in Bluff Creek, California. Nearly half a century later, Bigfoot's existence problems were re-discussed through the footprints found, photos were posted. But after 5 years of research, the truth after publication turned out to be funny: 'Bigfoot feathers' become the feathers of bison, bear or elk, and the ' Bigfoot blood' is an infusion!

At a press conference, Coltman revealed the results of DNA analyzes of hair samples believed to be Bigfoot's: it fits perfectly with bison's fur ! This bison is very popular in the region, so it seems that people's expectations and awareness have been affected by what happened three months earlier in Manitoba. However, this result does not discourage witnesses and those who believe in Bigfoot's existence.

Currently, all Bigfoot is considered fake, unidentified or derived from animals that everyone knows. Mysteriously Bigfoot is still there and the search continues

Tran Thanh Phong