Found Loch Ness monster

George Edwards, the Scottish captain, who has spent decades searching for the beast living on Loch Ness Lake, has just issued a final statement that he found this mysterious animal and obtained a photograph of evidence of it. .

>>>Loch Ness monster is like a log?

On November 2, 2011, from the deck of his ship, Edwards stumbled upon the image of a giant hump-like object rising from the water.'It is gray and moves slowly towards Urquhart Castle, about half a mile from the boat , ' Edwards said. He watched for about 5-10 minutes before it slowly sank into the water and didn't float again. Edwards said the reason for just now announcing the discovery was because he wanted experts to test it with certainty and affirmed that this was not a sturgeon as many of the previous mistakes were.

However, Edwards' descriptions also raised many questions. For example, if you look at it for 5 to 10 minutes, why is it that there is only one photo while you can take dozens or even hundreds of pictures? And although that object might seem big, it would be difficult to determine the size without knowing the exact distance (even though he said it was about half a mile from the ship) while nearby there was no comparison. good judgment. Depending on the proximity to the camera, its length will vary greatly, 1.5m or up to 15m.

There are many unknowns around, but if Edwards's information is correct, it can provide an important clue to identifying 'monsters'.

Captain George Edwards confirmed that this is the living beast
at Loch Ness lake that many people are looking for. (Photo: Cascade News)

In the past, mysterious objects emerged from the lake as described by Edwards, which appeared no less, the most famous of which was 'Champ' . It is believed that this is a sea monster living in Lake Champlain (Vermont) after examining a photograph taken by a woman named Sandra Mansi. However, this 'creature' was later proved to be almost certainly just a trunk floating on the water thanks to the gas produced during the decomposition process. At that time, it looked like a giant hump, which would then sink.

Experts have come up with details that create an abnormality for every picture that many people get "tricked" from time to time like this: unlike a rippling creature that usually appears just a few seconds and creating a blurry image, that mysterious object usually stays static for a few minutes, allowing the image to be sharper and clearer. The familiar model will then sink to the bottom of the lake and never return.

Moreover, both Lake Champlain and Loch Ness have many similar characteristics such as dense vegetation and there is reason to suspect that hydrological phenomena in nature are a major factor in image 2. this monster.

In addition, it is impossible to exclude the possibility that this is the purpose of the people motivated by some economic motivation. As in the case of Edwards, whether or not the use of images to promote the development of tourism is a question still in question.

Edwards may not have faked the image, but it does not rule out the possibility that people deliberately associate that appearance with the unclear 'beast' shape - which sounds more acceptable than the explanatory explanation. science. If it was a fish, it would stop at a mere word of mouth story but if somehow it became the 'best proof' regarding the sea monster Nessie, this information would immediately become national. sacrifice.

Loch Ness Monster Monster was first attracted to the world in the 1930s after the photo shows a strange head and neck swirling published widely by a surgeon named Kenneth Wilson. At that time, people always believed that this was 'the best proof of Nessie' and it was not until about 10 years later that the truth about a hoax was unraveled.

No one has been able to confirm the connection between Edwards' picture with the legendary Loch Ness monster, but one thing is certain that it is not the first 'best proof' nor can it be 'evidence'. the best ' final ' .