Do Americans come to the real Moon?

20% of Americans were asked not to believe that Americans had been to the Moon and that this was just a big scandal.

So far, perhaps everyone is convinced that the US won the Soviet Union in the race to the Moon. Neil Armstrong astronaut was the first to set foot on it.

From the ship that came out, he said a famous sentence that touched the whole world, that ' this is a small step of a human being but a giant step of humanity'. Everything is as clear as possible.

On the occasion of the International Cosmology, this problem is reworked. A poll showed that even in the United States, 20% of respondents did not believe that Americans had ever set foot on the Moon. 20% is a relatively high rate. These people thought that neither Armstrong nor anyone else had landed on the Moon, it was just a big scandal.

Images of Armstrong on the Moon.

It is true that studying the events in the Moon Program will reveal convincingly difficult issues in the framework of familiar theories about a flight to the Moon.

Since 1970, in the United States, J. Krainy has been published 'Is it true that humans have set foot on the Moon? ', and in 1976 American writer Bill Keysing also released a book entitled ' We have never been to the Moon ' .

Later in different countries around the world, the analysis of this issue is made more and more controversial with the irrefutable arguments of those who do not believe in the official statement of the Moon Program 's success. America. In one article, it is impossible to elaborate on everything that one has to offer but can only summarize the main ideas.

1. When the astronauts put a flag on the Moon, it flew very vividly. Apparently the wind blew quite strong. This is extremely absurd. Because everyone knows that there is no atmosphere on the Moon. So where is the wind? So, on two pictures of the same flag published by NASA, its shadow on a plate on the left, the other on the right.

2. Hot airflow from the spraying engine at landing must blow very hard , of course it will bounce off a funnel-shaped dust right back to the place where the train landed. But the images published by NASA do not see this phenomenon. The surface of the Moon flattened, without a dent.

3. Under the conditions of the Earth's force, his astronaut and flight suit weighs up to 160 kg. According to calculations, on the Moon that number is only 27 kg. So why don't astronauts show very high jumps because the Moon's attraction is less than a fifth of Earth's? The jump in the video clip is no higher than 45 cm, no different from walking on the surface of the globe. Why?

4. In the pictures of the Moon landscape, the light is very uneven. Such a type of light is a typical feature of using a spotlight rather than natural light.

There are several other reasons that are considered indirect. For example, the United States claims to have taken the Apollo ship to space using a giant " Saturn-5" transport missile. Only 20 years later, the Soviet Union built the famous rocket ' Energia ' with similar transport features. Could it be that the Soviet Union was dominant in missiles compared to them, suddenly being 'overtaken' by them for two decades?

Again, after executing the Moon Program, why their ' Saturn-5 ' missile was only used once - launched the ' Skylab ' spacecraft in 1973. That unique type of rocket If the United States is true, why are they hastily suspending their production and the three built ones must immediately be taken to the Museum?

Surprisingly, why is it so important to learn how to use a vehicle on the Moon so big and heavy, while the attraction of the Moon is much smaller than Earth's attraction? Let us remember that putting an object into the universe, one has to consider every gram, because adding one kilogram means adding a huge amount of money.

The rocket carries' Saturn-5 '(launched at' Kennedy's National Space Airport).

In general, there are many issues, and there is enough basis to doubt the US Moon Program . There is an opinion that Americans have never been to the Moon, and have the idea that their first flight to the Moon is only fabricated, then they can get to the real Moon later. The third type of opinion argues: Although the US Moon Program is covered with laurels, it is certainly not worth it. All images and videos are made on Earth.

Komsomolskaia newspaper Pravda met the famous writer Andrei Pashev to ask about this, he said: 'I used to participate in the debate about the flight to the Moon of America. Unbelievable ideas that the Americans had come to the Moon did not come from the former Soviet Union. People were only based on adventure and utopia (with the scientific level at the time) of this program. '

'For example, Khrushev himself, has declared, we will not participate in the race to the Moon, because it is extremely risky. In the history of the Soviet space industry there have been instances only. because of the contact between the ground command and the ship malfunctioning in a moment a ship had deviated from its orbit and the flight failed. The lake is as far away as the Moon " .

Before the sharp evidence in the US Moon Program controversy, NASA was forced to come to the conclusion that, to illustrate the Apollo 's landing on the Moon, they had to use video clips. and photos are not related to the actual flight . Some of the issues raised in the media are really photos taken during practice, they came up because it's very similar to the real scene on the Moon.

But they mentioned the fabrication of videos and photos. Other problems they have not explained and are not sorry. Some related experts also gradually showed up. For example, the documents lost when Apollo landed. It is also said that the pebbles that astronauts collect from the Moon's surface donated to European museums, known that NASA has also been cleared that they are 'mistaken' for the Earth's stone and not deliberate.